Our world is interconnected and intertwined more than all the previous centuries, and because the
economic mainstay of this interdependence, enough for any significant change in the economic center of gravity, leaving traces of the eternal consequences of all human beings.
The greatest example of that during the last decade, is the collapse of the mortgage market in the United States in the period between 2007 and 2008 and the resulting banking crisis, it has left a strong impact on the US economy in particular, and the world in general.
Despite the grandeur of the event and its impact on millions of people directly and then (the loss of wealth and homes - the loss of jobs, etc. ..), and billions of others indirectly, the disaster did not have many detailed processors cinematic, and remained just marginally happened to be employed, for example, to explain the personal function loss, the stories are not related to the crisis and the details of an economic basis.
The main reason for this overtaking Film Festival in Hollywood, due to the complexity of the economy and its terminology. It is difficult to summarize in a series of articles, the causes and roots of the economic crisis for the reader is not familiar with the economics of the banks, let alone ship as part of the scenario feature film tells the story of the characters essentially?
The film makers Big Short go in the opposite direction. During the events quotes the director and screenwriter Adam McKay, a true story from the book of Michael Lewis, who carried the same title, for 4 people in the banking and economic fields, read the signs of the crisis early before they occur, and decided to bet their wealth and their future career on them. Or in another way: for 4 people doubled their wealth thanks to the crisis gripped millions.
The film name is sometimes translated to "grand bargain", the translation is accurate. Short in the economy suggests a certain kind of deficit in the repayment of debt. However Description Big become closer simplified translation of the meaning (a sharp deficit - an acute shortage).
This point in terms of the special name economically, bring us back to the puzzle difficult to desired dissolved film throughout the film: How can simplify dozens of systems for the economic crisis and information, to become comprehensible to ordinary spectators?
He chose Adam McKay and Charles Randolph partner in the scenario, the drafting of a dramatic story in the nearest black comedy. What a bleak and melancholic and flagrant happen, it resembled stabbed is routed to the spectators. To solve your puzzle to present information, they decided to sometimes resort to (break the fourth wall).
The Big Short
Fourth Wall inherited from the world of theater term. And it is supposed that the personal can not see the audience and the audience sees it. Thus Representative imagine the existence of a fourth wall in front of him and a placebo instead of the public, similar to Wall events site (Home - Office - St .. etc.).
When dealing with the public profile and recognize his presence and his presence in front of her, or caused by, for example, directly, the scene described by (breaking the fourth wall), which is what happens a lot with the main characters in our film here. But the film sometimes and go to a higher stage, such as the use of Bmhahir Margo Ruby and Selena Gomez real Bchksyatem are the guests of honor, to make paragraphs explain economic terms.
Some of these scenes actually succeeded in simplifying the idea undershoot of the public, especially when the script strives to provide an effective visual equivalent of its own, in addition to dialogue. Special mention of the term, for example, explained in a scene is going on inside the gaming hall, and another is being explained in the words of chef in a restaurant, using the fish that are attended by the concoction as an indication.
Despite these touches and smart Acrohat from time to time, I imagine that the majority of spectators will sink in a sea of overall economic hieroglyphs throughout the film. I did not find a major crisis in the follow-up because my university elements of the economy and the banks, but I do not think that Adam McKay succeeded in simplifying the image to the public economically normal, active form in which it was targeted.
On the other hand, he won as a director representative staff very well, they include the 4-star Christian Bale, Ryan Gosling, Steve Carell, and Brad Pitt, and that was the last area of the role is very modest, and mostly took part in the film to give him a marketing push, as a product.
Cristian Bill in particular excels here on his role earned him an Oscar nomination. Thing always featured in his choices and his career, is that it does not provide a final role of the hero beloved who is beyond dispute, and tends constantly to figures gray axis reservations. His role is an extension of the same line. Socially isolated person since childhood, who does not find himself permanently with others, and most of the time it takes to do an economic analyst and head of the company, or a musician Kmadmn refuses to even be in his office wearing his shoes!
Other characters are served mostly also a way (non-belonging). All of them are far away even from the economic point into the crisis, and the behavioral and humanitarian level, is in harmony with the American system as a whole. But they also found confidence in themselves to bet on the opposite of what is betting it all the experts, and betting on the system.
Ryan Gosling won a step forward here, too, thanks to the role does not depend on the usual male attendance points. On the contrary, it Steve Carell did not benefit from the same degree of the film. Karel crisis here is not about his abilities as an actor, as they relate to the scenario and output, which makes personal repeated dozens of times, and is not free of boredom, one section in the sense (oh my god I can not believe this nonsense).
General director Adam McKay did not fluent in the art of shorthand here. Each time invents a game visual, neglect to use a disturbingly childlike. Dozens of shots here where, for example, tend to use the zoom violent, or move the camera continuously vibratory. It is used by some of the game to give the picture the character strung, as close as possible to the viewer Cameras news channels phones.
Mostly chose Barry Ackroyd director of photography, who usually works with director Paul Greengrass for this reason. Barry works with Greengrass include United 93, and Captain Phillips. Stmah in films shaky camera does not subside for the movement, to serve stringed stories related to the facts of a real terrorist events.
Here the tricks of the camera that does not stop the movement, in line with the same degree skies do not look. McKay overkill to use most of the time artificially, sometimes interrupt tens good representational scenes, separated by a spectator for the sense of spectacle.
Overall, we can say that the effort Ksenarist Adam McKay, it was partly because of wasted effort as a director. Were it not for the good performance analog crew, masterly montage who treated some of the flaws, the movie lost more and more because of his over-zealous in some points visually. I see his work as a director is totally worthy to compete for the Oscar Best Director.
The Big Short
Although this film remains a strong leap in his career as a director, given the list of his previous films, which are limited in the medium with Comedy starring Will Farrell, and often give him the task of other opportunities in the future. The film candidate for five Oscars this season (film - director - actor / Cristian Bell - Adapted Screenplay - montage).
Read Oadha- read in the list of nominations and the Oscar Surprises 2016
Whatever flaws remain The Big Short work worth graciousness, because it is witnessing a valiant attempt to visit the area of IT and economic difficult, for the acts of the novelist.
For those interested in watching other film work for the economic crisis of 2008, I would advise to Margin Call (2011) as an act of another good novelist, up Inside Job (2010) as a film documentary explains the dimensions and economic roots of the problem better. By the way, he won the last time the Oscar for best documentary.
In brief:
An innovative scenario largely decode the economic crisis in 2008 and its causes, within a work of fiction. Despite the lack of success in deciphering the hieroglyphs most, the work is worth remains a road, thanks to the sharp and balanced montage and the performance of the crew representative. Especially Cristian Bell, which adds to the tally role of another important and different.
ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق